Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers » Blog

What does it mean to be a surety?

gold — Thu, 16 May 2013 20:36:12 +0000

If somebody close to you has been arrested, they may ask you to become a surety for the purpose of their interim release. Very basically, this means that the accused person has been arrested and the court may be willing to allow them out of jail while they await trial or resolution of their charges, Read more

The post What does it mean to be a surety? appeared first on Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers.

R. v. Pham: collateral factors, immigration and sentencing: Supreme Court

Sean Robichaud — Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:33:27 +0000

On March 14, 2013 the Supreme Court of Canada released the judgment of R. v. Pham 2013 SCC 15, clarifying what collateral factors and effects a sentencing judge may take into consideration when fashioning a particular punishment. The Supreme Court held that sentencing judges may exercise discretion and take take immigration consequences into account. In order Read more

The post R. v. Pham: collateral factors, immigration and sentencing: Supreme Court appeared first on Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers.

R. v. Summers by the Ont.C.A., enhanced credit, & pre-trial custody.

Sean Robichaud — Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:50:45 +0000

The use of enhanced credit for pre-trial custody, or “dead time”, has long been a point of controversy among the public. It is often perceived a a mechanism for criminals serving less time then they would actually obtain if they had served the sentence and getting off light as a result. That controversy, and Read more

The post R. v. Summers by the Ont.C.A., enhanced credit, & pre-trial custody. appeared first on Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers.

The frailties of identification evidence results in new trial ordered by the Ont.C.A.

Sean Robichaud — Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:32:43 +0000

The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision of R. v. Gough, 2013 ONCA 137, released March 6, 2013, is another reminder to trial judges of the significant frailties of identification evidence and the special scrutiny required when assessing cases of this nature. Mr. Gough was convicted of a street level robbery in Ottawa. The only issue of the trial was the Read more

The post The frailties of identification evidence results in new trial ordered by the Ont.C.A. appeared first on Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers.

Top 10 iPad Trial Lawyer Apps: Litigate Electronically With Style

Sean Robichaud — Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:15:08 +0000

A while back, I authored an article entitled “Top 10 iPad Trial Lawyer Apps” that was quite popular for criminal lawyers and litigators like myself who rely on technology to enhance their practice and their skills of persuasion in a courtroom. In the process of updating our website, that post was lost so I am Read more

The post Top 10 iPad Trial Lawyer Apps: Litigate Electronically With Style appeared first on Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers.

The impropriety of commenting on the veracity of another witness: R. v. R.H. Ont.C.A. (2013)

Sean Robichaud — Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:53:25 +0000

Yesterday the Court of Appeal of Ontario released the judgment R. v. R.H. which reversed a finding of guilt and entered an acquittal where a judge improperly allowed, and considered, the inability of an accused to provide an explanation why the complainant might lie about her alleged sexual assault. Although it is well settled law Read more

The post The impropriety of commenting on the veracity of another witness: R. v. R.H. Ont.C.A. (2013) appeared first on Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers.

Our firm in the news: February 2013

Sean Robichaud — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:51:21 +0000

With the recent coverage of the R. v. Fearon cell phone case that we provided commentary, Robichaud’s is frequently quoted as an expert in the area of law across the country in February: Regina: Leader Post, Global News Saskatoon: Global News Winnipeg: Winnipeg Free Press British Columbia: The Province, Global News Toronto: Global News‘ Kitchener: CTV Read more

The post Our firm in the news: February 2013 appeared first on Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers.

Why bail matters: the example of Oscar Pistorius Bail

Sean Robichaud — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:14:04 +0000

With all the recent coverage of the Pistorius allegations of murder, and the bail now wrapping up the fourth day of proceedings, the issue of bail has taken centre stage in every day conversations. Chief Magistrate Desmond Nair will deliver judgment today on whether or not Pistorius will be released pending his trial; regardless of Read more

The post Why bail matters: the example of Oscar Pistorius Bail appeared first on Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers.

No password on your phone? Fair game for police to search on arrest: R. v. Fearon, Ont.C.A., Feb 20, 2013

Sean Robichaud — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:12:33 +0000

On February 20, 2013 the Ontario Court of Appeal released the decision of R. v. Fearon, 2013 ONCA 106 that explored the common law right of police to search incident to arrest. In this particular case it dealt squarely with the issue of how far police may legally go in searching the contents of a cellular phone seized from a Read more

The post No password on your phone? Fair game for police to search on arrest: R. v. Fearon, Ont.C.A., Feb 20, 2013 appeared first on Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers.

Exercising your right to Google your criminal lawyer upon arrest

Sean Robichaud — Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:11:21 +0000

A recent decision from an Alberta Provincial Court has raised an interesting question for a person’s to contact a lawyer in the age of the internet: Do you have the right to Google your lawyer when under arrest? The decision of R. v. McKay 2013 ABPC 13 says yes. The case came before Justice H.A. Lamoureux and focused squarely Read more

The post Exercising your right to Google your criminal lawyer upon arrest appeared first on Robichaud's | Toronto Criminal Lawyers.